The record usually holds what the visit needs. Nobody has twenty minutes to go find it. VisitIQ reads it first and hands back one page: what is going on, what is missing, and what is supportable — with the sentence behind every line. After the visit, it writes the documentation and the codes.
Inside VisitIQ
Every capability below exists because a practice asked for it. Nothing here is a roadmap item.
The record in one page
Twelve months of notes, labs, vitals, imaging, and claims condensed into a summary a physician reads in a minute — with every line linked to its source.
Diagnosis gaps, made visible
Conditions the record clearly supports but the assessment never names. Raised as a question with the evidence attached. Nothing is coded on its own.
Service gaps, made visible
Care already delivered and care now due: advance care planning, tobacco cessation, obesity counseling, depression screening, wellness visit components.
Documentation written in
Agree with a finding and the required language appears in the encounter note. No second portal. No extra clicks.
Coding at signature
CPT, ICD-10, modifiers, and diagnosis pairing derived from the signed note. Necessity and payer edits run first; anything unclear goes to a coder.
Evidence on every line
Sentence, page, and date behind every gap and every code — the same packet an auditor would ask for.
Tomorrow’s schedule, already read
Each morning the panel lists the day’s patients with the gaps found and the services the record supports. The rule is simple: if the chart cannot prove it, it is not shown.
| Time | Patient | Gap found | Code | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08:20 | M. Torres | Advance care planning discussed, never documented | 99497 | 3 chart facts |
| 09:00 | R. Chen | Kidney disease staged in labs, absent from assessment | N18.31 | 3 eGFR draws |
| 09:40 | A. Gomez | Obesity counseling delivered, not captured | G0447 | BMI 34.1 |
| 10:20 | D. Kapoor | Depression screening overdue 14 months | G0444 | Last done 14 mo |
| 11:00 | P. Shah | Wellness visit components split across three visits | G0439 | Provider input |
“Advance care planning discussion, 18 minutes, with patient and daughter present. Reviewed goals of care, surrogate decision-maker, and completion of healthcare proxy form...”
Illustrative example · not real patient data
Type 2 diabetes with CKD (E11.22) · Chronic diastolic HF (I50.32) · CKD stage 3a (N18.31) · Hypertension (I10).
Colonoscopy 2019 (due 2029) · Mammogram overdue by 7 months · Diabetic eye exam overdue · Pneumococcal complete.
eGFR has been under 60 on three draws across 9 months. Does the record support a documented CKD stage this visit? Agree · Disagree · Need more information.
From the schedule to the signed record
Schedule syncs
Tomorrow’s appointments arrive overnight with each patient’s record identifiers.
Record is read
Notes, labs, vitals, imaging, and prior claims are reviewed for every scheduled patient.
Gaps surface
Diagnosis, service, and care gaps appear together, each with the evidence behind it.
Documented and coded
The provider agrees, the language lands in the note, and the visit codes itself.
Facts, not promises.
These are properties of how VisitIQ is built — not projected savings. Results in your practice depend on your payers, your panel, and your documentation.
Notes, labs, vitals, imaging, and claims for every patient on the schedule
The whole record condensed into a single readable summary
Every gap and every code traceable to the sentence that supports it
Organizations that run on VisitIQ
A good fit when…
- Physicians who finish charting after dinner
- Organizations where care is delivered and never captured
- Care teams that have switched off every alert tool they have tried
See VisitIQ on your own workflow.
Tell us what your organization is fighting — open care gaps, documentation, denials, coverage — and we will walk you through the part of the platform that closes it.