Built by the three groups that actually decide whether a visit gets paid.
OptimIQ Health was founded by experienced internal medicine physicians, revenue cycle experts, and an AI, NLP, and machine learning team — working on the same problem from three directions at once.
The chart already contains the answer. Nobody has time to read it.
An organization generates more documentation than any human can review before a fifteen-minute visit. So coverage goes unverified, chronic conditions go unaddressed, services go unbilled, and denials get written off. Not because the practice is careless — because the reading has to happen faster than a person can read.
A physician knows which sentence in a two-hundred-page chart matters, and which suggestion is a distraction during a visit.
An RCM veteran knows which payer will deny, which code needs which modifier, and which denial is worth appealing twice.
An AI team knows how to make a language model cite its source, hold back when unsure, and stay auditable a year later.
Clinical, financial, and technical, arguing until the answer holds.
Nothing ships unless every group agrees it is clinically sound, financially correct, and technically defensible.

Internal medicine physicians
Practicing clinicians who have carried the panel, signed the notes, and answered the payer query. They decide what belongs in a chart and what is noise.

Revenue cycle experts
Veterans of eligibility, coding, denials, and payer contracts who have run revenue cycles at scale and know exactly where the money leaks.

AI, NLP, and ML engineers
Engineers who build clinical language systems that cite their sources, hold a code until the chart supports it, and keep a human in the loop by design.
The rules we do not trade away.
These are the constraints that shaped every product decision in the platform — including the features we chose not to build.
Evidence or nothing
Every code, diagnosis, and query carries the chart sentence that supports it. If the chart does not support it, the system stays quiet.
A human always signs
Our models draft, rank, and cite. A coder, nurse, or physician accepts. We do not ship anything that bills on its own authority.
Clinician time is the scarcest resource
If a feature adds a click to a physician’s day without removing two, it does not belong in the product.
Honest numbers only
We publish what the platform does, not projected savings we cannot stand behind. Results shown to you come from your data, in your review.
What we will not do.
Worth saying out loud, because in this category most of the disappointment comes from things a vendor implied and never wrote down.
We do not upcode. Suggestions stop at what the documentation supports, and our reviewers are measured on accuracy, not lift.
We do not sell a second inbox. If a product cannot live inside the EHR workflow, we do not ship it.
We do not publish testimonials or metrics we cannot attribute to a named customer who approved them.
Talk to the people who built it.
Demos are run by the physicians and revenue cycle leads on our team, not a sales engineer reading a script.

