Skip to content
OptimIQ Health
Line illustration of a quiet landscape
About OptimIQ

About.

OptimIQ runs the eligibility, prior auth, coding, denials, and care-gap work for practices, provider groups, and ACOs. People do the work. Software keeps it moving. One accountable team for the whole revenue cycle.

What we believe

Better outcomes start with better operations.

Most of healthcare’s revenue and quality problems are not clinical. They are operational. Eligibility checks that did not happen. Auths that timed out. Codes that were not documented. Care gaps that were never flagged.

We exist to make those problems disappear, quietly, in the background, every day. We bring the operators who run the work and the platform that keeps it moving, one accountable team for what your billing, coding, AR, and quality programs actually need to ship.

How we operate

Four commitments that shape every engagement.

These are not aspirational. They are how we decide what to build, who to hire, and which engagements to walk away from.

The team behind it

Run by people who do this work.

Specialty coders, denial analysts, AR ops leads, and engineers operating as one team alongside your front office. Software handles the predictable. People handle the rest.

  • Specialty-trained operators on every account
  • Healthcare-native engineering and product team
  • 460+ in-house operators across coding, denials, A/R, and clinical review
  • 15 specialties with their own rule packs and audit standards
  • Outcome-tied contracts on every engagement
  • US-based clinical leadership across coding and quality

One accountable team

Healthcare-native by design

Operators and platform together

Outcomes on the same dashboard

Who built it

Clinical, financial, and technical, arguing until the answer holds.

OptimIQ Health was founded by experienced internal medicine physicians, revenue cycle experts, and an AI, NLP, and machine learning team. Nothing ships unless every group agrees it is clinically sound, financially correct, and technically defensible.

Internal medicine physicians

Practicing clinicians who have carried the panel, signed the notes, and answered the payer query. They decide what belongs in a chart and what is noise.

Revenue cycle experts

Veterans of eligibility, coding, denials, and payer contracts who have run revenue cycles at scale and know exactly where the money leaks.

AI, NLP, and ML engineers

Engineers who build clinical language systems that cite their sources, hold a code until the chart supports it, and keep a human in the loop by design.

Plainly

What we will not do.

Worth saying out loud, because in this category most of the disappointment comes from things a vendor implied and never wrote down.

  • We do not upcode. Suggestions stop at what the documentation supports, and our reviewers are measured on accuracy, not lift.

  • We do not sell a second inbox. If a product cannot live inside the EHR workflow, we do not ship it.

  • We do not publish testimonials or metrics we cannot attribute to a named customer who approved them.

Where we’re going

Toward an operations layer that disappears.

The end state is not a bigger dashboard. It is fewer queues, fewer handoffs, and fewer people asking why a claim sat. We are building an operations layer that runs in the background, surfaces only what needs a decision, and gets quieter as it gets better.

Talk to the people who built it.

Demos are run by the physicians and revenue cycle leads on our team, not a sales engineer reading a script.